Focused search for Arguments from Propositional Knowledge
نویسندگان
چکیده
Classical propositional logic is an appealing option for modelling argumentation but the computational viability of generating an argument is an issue. Here we propose ameliorating this problem by harnessing the notion of a connection graph to reduce the search space when seeking all the arguments for a claim from a knowledgebase. For a set of clauses, a connection graph is a graph where each node is a clause and each arc denotes that there exist complementary disjuncts in the pair of nodes. For a set of formulae in conjunctive normal form, we use the notion of the connection graph for the set of clauses obtained from the conjuncts in the formulae. When seeking arguments for a claim, we can focus our search on a particular subgraph of the connection graph that we call the focal graph. Locating this subgraph is relatively inexpensive in terms of computational cost. In addition, using (as the search space) the formulae of the initial knowledgebase, whose conjuncts relate to this subgraph, can substantially reduce the cost of looking for arguments. We provide a theoretical framework and algorithms for this proposal, together with some theoretical results and some preliminary experimental results to indicate the potential of the approach.
منابع مشابه
Algorithms for Effective Argumentation in Classical Propositional Logic: A Connection Graph Approach
There are a number of frameworks for modelling argumentation in logic. They incorporate a formal representation of individual arguments and techniques for comparing conflicting arguments. A common assumption for logicbased argumentation is that an argument is a pair 〈Φ,α〉 where Φ is minimal subset of the knowledgebase such that Φ is consistent and Φ entails the claim α. Different logics provide...
متن کاملAlgorithms for computational argumentation in artificial intelligence
Argumentation is a vital aspect of intelligent behaviour by humans. It provides the means for comparing information by analysing pros and cons when trying to make a decision. Formalising argumentation in computational environment has become a topic of increasing interest in artificial intelligence research over the last decade. Computational argumentation involves reasoning with uncertainty by ...
متن کاملInformation Update and Covert Modality in the Semantics of Propositional Attitude Verbs
This paper investigates previously unrecognized aspects of the interpretation of clausal arguments of propositional attitude predicates. It provides an account of them based on a newly identified modal operator in the lexical meaning of propositional attitude predicates, which applies to the context change in an attributed information state effected by the argument clause of the attitude predic...
متن کاملPropositional Non-Monotonic Reasoning and Inconsistency in Symmetric Neural Networks
We define a notion of reasoning using world-rank-functions, independently of any symbolic language. We then show that every symmetric neural network (like Hopfield networks or Boltzman machines) can be seen as performing a search for a satisfying model of some knowledge that is wired into the network's topology and weights. Several equivalent languages are then shown to describe symbolically th...
متن کاملElement of justification in contemporary epistemology
The definition of propositional knowledge has been said to be: "knowledge is belief in justified truth" and belief, truth, and justified are necessary and adequate conditions in the actualization of knowledge. Many faults have been directed towards this three elemental definition, which some of them have been derived from the element of justification. This article reviews some of the most im...
متن کامل